BBHL vs. GRW
Compare and contrast key facts about BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW).
BBHL and GRW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBHL is a passively managed fund by BBH that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Sep 9, 2019. GRW is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on May 6, 2024.
Performance
BBHL vs. GRW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBHL vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | -6.30% | 2.72% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | -11.04% | 1.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHL achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly higher than GRW's -11.04% return.
BBHL
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRW
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -11.04%
- 6M
- -14.48%
- 1Y
- -17.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBHL vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHL has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BBHL vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank
BBHL
GRW
BBHL vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHL | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | -0.21 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHL and GRW is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BBHL vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison
BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.30% | 0.27% | 11.37% |
Drawdowns
BBHL vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHL drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum GRW drawdown of -23.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHL and GRW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHL | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -23.84% | +11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -21.25% | +12.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -5.92% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.05% | — |
Volatility
BBHL vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBHL | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 17.96% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 16.19% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 16.19% | -3.21% |