EUSA vs. GSEW
EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) and GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while GSEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUSA returned 8.03%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for GSEW. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
EUSA vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EUSA having a 9.88% return and GSEW slightly higher at 10.25%.
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
EUSA vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 9.88% | 10.24% | 14.64% | 17.72% | -17.13% | 25.60% | 15.03% | 30.56% | -8.58% | 7.54% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 10.25% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUSA and GSEW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between EUSA and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUSA vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUSA
GSEW
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
EUSA
GSEW
Industrials
EUSA
GSEW
Financial Services
EUSA
GSEW
Healthcare
EUSA
GSEW
Consumer Cyclical
EUSA
GSEW
Utilities
EUSA
GSEW
Real Estate
EUSA
GSEW
Consumer Defensive
EUSA
GSEW
Communication Services
EUSA
GSEW
Energy
EUSA
GSEW
Basic Materials
EUSA
GSEW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUSA vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank
EUSA
GSEW
EUSA vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUSA | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 1.70 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.42 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.69 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 10.32 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUSA | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.70 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.62 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
EUSA vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, roughly equal to the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and GSEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUSA | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -38.65% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -7.72% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.20% | -18.18% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -25.74% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -5.89% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.02% | -0.05% |
Volatility
EUSA vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.69%. This indicates that EUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUSA | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 2.69% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 9.05% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 12.10% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.91% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 19.20% | -0.86% |
EUSA vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EUSA and GSEW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUSA vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison
EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than GSEW's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.51% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.41% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, EUSA and GSEW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EUSA has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to GSEW (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs GSEW's -38.65%.
On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.93% vs 8.03% for EUSA. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.93% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSA and GSEW have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.41% for GSEW.
EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs.
GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EUSA and GSEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer