PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUSA vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EUSA having a 9.88% return and GSEW slightly higher at 10.25%.


EUSA

1D
0.29%
1M
4.01%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.95%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
11.64%

GSEW

1D
0.20%
1M
3.49%
YTD
10.25%
6M
11.51%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSA vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
9.88%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%7.54%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
10.25%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and GSEW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017

0.98

The correlation between EUSA and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUSA vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUSA
GSEW

Technology

21.3%
20.9%

Industrials

14.7%
15.6%

Financial Services

14.4%
14.3%

Healthcare

10.1%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
9.1%

Utilities

5.6%
5.8%

Real Estate

5.5%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

4.8%
3.5%

Energy

4.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.1%
4.6%

Technology

EUSA
21.3%
GSEW
20.9%

Industrials

EUSA
14.7%
GSEW
15.6%

Financial Services

EUSA
14.4%
GSEW
14.3%

Healthcare

EUSA
10.1%
GSEW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EUSA
9.7%
GSEW
9.1%

Utilities

EUSA
5.6%
GSEW
5.8%

Real Estate

EUSA
5.5%
GSEW
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

EUSA
5.2%
GSEW
5.7%

Communication Services

EUSA
4.8%
GSEW
3.5%

Energy

EUSA
4.6%
GSEW
4.9%

Basic Materials

EUSA
4.1%
GSEW
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUSAGSEWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.70

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.42

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.69

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.14

10.32

-0.18

EUSA vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUSAGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.70

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, roughly equal to the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSAGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-38.65%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-7.72%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-18.18%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-25.74%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-5.89%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.02%

-0.05%

Volatility

EUSA vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.69%. This indicates that EUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUSAGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.69%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

9.05%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

12.10%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

16.91%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

19.20%

-0.86%

EUSA vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUSA and GSEW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUSA vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than GSEW's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.51%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.41%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EUSA and GSEW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EUSA has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to GSEW (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.93% vs 8.03% for EUSA. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.93% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUSA and GSEW have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.41% for GSEW.

EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUSA and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer