ESPO vs. IVRS
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPO returned 19.46%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for IVRS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IVRS.
Performance
ESPO vs. IVRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than IVRS's -5.51% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- -1.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. IVRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 15.25% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -5.51% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and IVRS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ESPO and IVRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. IVRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
IVRS
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
IVRS
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
IVRS
Technology
ESPO
IVRS
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Energy
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
IVRS
Healthcare
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Real Estate
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
IVRS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. IVRS — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
IVRS
ESPO vs. IVRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | IVRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.04 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.08 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | IVRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | -0.05 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. IVRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than IVRS's maximum drawdown of -31.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and IVRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | IVRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -31.43% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -31.43% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -31.43% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -18.72% | -6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -5.81% | -9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 14.55% | +0.75% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. IVRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 5.00%, while iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | IVRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 5.53% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 18.59% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 21.85% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 20.49% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 20.49% | +5.26% |
ESPO vs. IVRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IVRS's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. IVRS - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than IVRS's 8.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.34% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and IVRS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to ESPO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs IVRS's -31.43%.
On 3-year performance, ESPO leads with 19.46% vs 9.46% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 1.44% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IVRS is Technology Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and IVRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer