ESPO vs. GAMR
ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) are both Gaming funds - ESPO tracks the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index while GAMR tracks the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 8.32%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GAMR. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GAMR.
Performance
ESPO vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -9.09% return, which is significantly lower than GAMR's 3.02% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -10.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M | |
| $69.51K | $68.28K | $108.93K |
ESPO vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.02% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 14.76% | -11.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and GAMR is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ESPO and GAMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. GAMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
GAMR
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
GAMR
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
GAMR
Technology
ESPO
GAMR
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Energy
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
GAMR
Healthcare
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Real Estate
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
GAMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
GAMR
ESPO vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.05 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.16 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 0.35 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum GAMR drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -55.37% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.43% | -29.36% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.43% | -29.36% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -50.57% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -14.16% | -7.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -22.03% | +6.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.32% | 13.55% | +4.77% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) at 6.33%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 6.33% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 19.39% | -3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 23.84% | -4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 24.67% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 24.38% | +1.27% |
ESPO vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GAMR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than GAMR's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and GAMR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to GAMR (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 8.32% vs 0.86% for GAMR. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.
ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.59% for GAMR.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer