ESPO vs. HERO
ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 7.12%/yr vs -3.34%/yr for HERO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
ESPO vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -13.95% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- 6M
- -11.34%
- YTD
- -10.86%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
HERO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- 6M
- -15.22%
- YTD
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- -16.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- -3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -10.86% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 11.29% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.95% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and HERO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ESPO and HERO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
HERO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ESPO
HERO
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
HERO
-
Communication Services
ESPO
HERO
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Energy
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Healthcare
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
HERO
Real Estate
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
HERO
ESPO vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.86 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.56 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | -1.05 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -54.02% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.43% | -30.78% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.43% | -30.78% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -46.57% | -1.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.56% | -27.59% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.16% | -26.01% | +10.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.38% | 16.47% | +0.91% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.86%, while Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 5.16% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 15.71% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 19.64% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 23.39% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 24.41% | +1.24% |
ESPO vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than HERO's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.40% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ESPO and HERO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HERO has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to ESPO (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 7.12% vs -3.34% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 7.12% return vs -3.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.40% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Gaming, while HERO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.50% for HERO.
ESPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer