ESPO vs. HERO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ESPO tracks the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index while HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.49%/yr vs -4.76%/yr for HERO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.

Performance

ESPO vs. HERO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -17.16% return.

ESPO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: -15.10%
• 6M: -16.17%
• 1Y: -14.01%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: —

HERO

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -17.16%
• 6M: -17.60%
• 1Y: -19.33%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: -4.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	-15.10%	25.79%	47.61%	33.64%	-34.71%	-2.13%	83.93%	11.29%
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	-17.16%	28.74%	17.65%	8.36%	-33.42%	-8.37%	91.02%	9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and HERO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.88

The correlation between ESPO and HERO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESPO vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESPO	HERO
Technology	56.2%	7.0%
Communication Services	29.4%	91.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ESPO vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO

ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 4
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

HERO

HERO Risk / Return Rank: 2
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESPO	HERO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	-1.01	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	-1.34	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.84	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	-0.70	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	-1.33	+0.39

ESPO vs. HERO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is comparable to the HERO Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and HERO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and HERO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESPO	HERO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-54.02%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.81%	-28.08%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.81%	-28.08%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.33%	-48.06%	-0.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.19%	-30.29%	+3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-25.97%	+10.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.95%	14.82%	+1.13%

Volatility

ESPO vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESPO	HERO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	4.45%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.67%	15.21%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.83%	19.53%	-0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.10%	23.36%	+1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.71%	24.46%	+1.25%

ESPO vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESPO vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than HERO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	1.47%	1.24%	0.44%	0.96%	0.91%	3.36%	0.12%	0.22%	0.04%
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	1.96%	1.62%	1.06%	0.73%	0.28%	0.79%	0.71%	0.17%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESPO and HERO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ESPO and HERO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ESPO or HERO?

HERO has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs HERO's -54.02%.

Which ETF is better, ESPO or HERO?

On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 5.49% vs -4.76% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESPO or HERO?

Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 5.49% return vs -4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESPO or HERO?

HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESPO or HERO?

HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.

What is the main difference between ESPO and HERO?

ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.50% for HERO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.80 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.