ESPO vs. HERO
ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 8.32%/yr vs -2.11%/yr for HERO. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
ESPO vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -9.09% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -11.80% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -10.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
HERO
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -14.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M | |
| $807.35K | $571.35K | $683.96K |
ESPO vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 11.29% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -11.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and HERO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ESPO and HERO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
HERO
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
HERO
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
HERO
-
Technology
ESPO
HERO
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Energy
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Healthcare
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Industrials
ESPO
-
HERO
Real Estate
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
HERO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
HERO
ESPO vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.89 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | -0.49 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -0.85 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -54.02% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.43% | -30.78% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.43% | -30.78% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -46.42% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -25.78% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -26.03% | +10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.32% | 17.59% | +0.73% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 6.66%, while Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 7.30% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 16.73% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 20.54% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 23.51% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 24.45% | +1.20% |
ESPO vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than HERO's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.77% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and HERO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to ESPO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 8.32% vs -2.11% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 8.32% return vs -2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.37% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Gaming, while HERO is Large Cap Growth Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.50% for HERO.
ESPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer