ESPO vs. FBL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. ESPO is passively managed, while FBL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPO returned 16.96%/yr vs 25.43%/yr for FBL. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FBL.

Performance

ESPO vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -34.05% return.

ESPO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: -15.10%
• 6M: -16.17%
• 1Y: -14.92%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: —

FBL

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -17.09%
• YTD: -34.05%
• 6M: -31.11%
• 1Y: -46.30%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	-15.10%	25.79%	47.61%	33.64%	-4.82%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-34.05%	0.50%	112.72%	341.59%	-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO and FBL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022	0.49

ESPO vs. FBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESPO	FBL
Communication Services	78.1%	66.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	-
Technology	8.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ESPO vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO

ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 4
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESPO	FBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	-0.65	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	-0.73	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.91	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	-0.76	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	-1.36	+0.43

ESPO vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is comparable to the FBL Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO and FBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESPO vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and FBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESPO	FBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-61.15%	+10.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.81%	-61.03%	+33.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.81%	-61.15%	+33.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.19%	-57.26%	+30.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-16.70%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.95%	33.98%	-18.03%

Volatility

ESPO vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.42%, while GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a volatility of 20.60%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESPO	FBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	20.60%	-16.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.67%	53.92%	-39.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.83%	71.02%	-52.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.10%	71.08%	-45.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.71%	71.08%	-45.37%

ESPO vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESPO vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FBL's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	1.47%	1.24%	0.44%	0.96%	0.91%	3.36%	0.12%	0.22%	0.04%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	3.14%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESPO and FBL in my portfolio?

ESPO and FBL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESPO or FBL?

FBL has higher volatility (20.60%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs FBL's -61.15%.

Which ETF is better, ESPO or FBL?

On 3-year performance, FBL leads with 25.43% vs 16.96% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESPO or FBL?

Over the 3-year period, FBL has performed better with a 25.43% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESPO or FBL?

ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESPO or FBL?

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.

What is the main difference between ESPO and FBL?

ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 1.15% for FBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.