ESOA vs. FN
ESOA (Energy Services Of America Corp) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. ESOA operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ESOA returned 29.22%/yr vs 29.26%/yr for FN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESOA vs. FN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 95.71% return, which is significantly higher than FN's 8.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESOA having a 29.22% annualized return and FN not far ahead at 29.26%.
ESOA
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- 6M
- 82.95%
- YTD
- 95.71%
- 1Y
- 65.28%
- 3Y*
- 80.40%
- 5Y*
- 48.88%
- 10Y*
- 29.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.71%
FN
- 1D
- 3.32%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 58.95%
- 3Y*
- 58.71%
- 5Y*
- 39.38%
- 10Y*
- 29.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.76%
ESOA vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 95.71% | -34.42% | 111.44% | 140.93% | -22.02% | 223.53% | 32.47% | -30.56% | 38.82% | -36.06% |
FN Fabrinet | 8.56% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESOA and FN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2012 | 0.06 |
The correlation between ESOA and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESOA:
$297.06M
FN:
$17.71B
ESOA:
$0.54
FN:
$11.64
ESOA:
29.25
FN:
42.46
ESOA:
0.68
FN:
1.82
ESOA:
0.61
FN:
4.22
ESOA:
3.43
FN:
7.77
ESOA:
$440.96M
FN:
$4.24B
ESOA:
$52.66M
FN:
$509.75M
ESOA:
$27.20M
FN:
$422.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESOA vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank
ESOA
FN
ESOA vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESOA | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.54 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 4.59 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESOA vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and FN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESOA | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.67% | -70.46% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.16% | -38.35% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.43% | -38.35% | -19.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.43% | -38.70% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.62% | -51.11% | -18.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.68% | -33.79% | +16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.86% | -22.62% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.72% | 12.89% | +1.83% |
Volatility
ESOA vs. FN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) is 14.49%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 20.24%. This indicates that ESOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESOA | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.49% | 20.24% | -5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.57% | 56.58% | -8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.04% | 69.61% | -6.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.94% | 54.51% | +21.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.05% | 48.71% | +47.34% |
Dividends
ESOA vs. FN - Dividend Comparison
ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 0.82% | 1.47% | 0.24% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 5.88% |
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESOA vs. FN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESOA vs. FN - Profitability Comparison
ESOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 10.23M and revenue of 93.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.0%.
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
ESOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
ESOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 215.55K and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESOA and FN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (20.24%) compared to ESOA (14.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESOA dropped -76.67% vs FN's -70.46%.
ESOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESOA and FN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer