ESOA vs. CLMB
ESOA (Energy Services Of America Corp) and CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) are both stocks. ESOA operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while CLMB operates in Electronics & Computer Distribution (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ESOA returned 27.68%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for CLMB. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESOA vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 89.54% return, which is significantly higher than CLMB's -7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has outperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 27.68%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively lower 20.89% annualized return.
ESOA
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -10.75%
- YTD
- 89.54%
- 6M
- 82.22%
- 1Y
- 42.15%
- 3Y*
- 91.64%
- 5Y*
- 49.24%
- 10Y*
- 27.68%
CLMB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 18.14%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- -14.10%
- 1Y
- -9.53%
- 3Y*
- 27.04%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 20.89%
ESOA vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 89.54% | -34.42% | 111.44% | 140.93% | -22.02% | 223.53% | 32.47% | -30.56% | 38.82% | -36.06% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -7.50% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESOA and CLMB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2012 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, ESOA and CLMB have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ESOA:
$271.43M
CLMB:
$432.99M
ESOA:
$0.55
CLMB:
$1.16
ESOA:
28.25
CLMB:
20.57
ESOA:
0.65
CLMB:
0.87
ESOA:
0.59
CLMB:
0.62
ESOA:
3.33
CLMB:
3.66
ESOA:
$440.96M
CLMB:
$696.85M
ESOA:
$52.66M
CLMB:
$108.37M
ESOA:
$27.20M
CLMB:
$35.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESOA vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank
ESOA
CLMB
ESOA vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESOA | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.01 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.18 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | -0.37 | +3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESOA | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | -0.18 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.64 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.22 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ESOA vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, smaller than the maximum CLMB drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and CLMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESOA | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.67% | -89.12% | +12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.16% | -53.40% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.43% | -53.40% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.43% | -53.40% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.62% | -53.40% | -16.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.03% | -33.59% | +14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.05% | -32.23% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.37% | 25.81% | -10.44% |
Volatility
ESOA vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison
Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) has a higher volatility of 23.82% compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) at 10.32%. This indicates that ESOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESOA | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.82% | 10.32% | +13.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.21% | 40.72% | +6.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.12% | 52.14% | +10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.04% | 45.76% | +30.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.13% | 40.89% | +55.24% |
Dividends
ESOA vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison
ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than CLMB's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.36% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 0.78% | 1.47% | 0.24% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESOA vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESOA vs. CLMB - Profitability Comparison
ESOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 10.23M and revenue of 93.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.0%.
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
ESOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
ESOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 215.55K and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESOA and CLMB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESOA has higher volatility (23.82%) compared to CLMB (10.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESOA dropped -76.67% vs CLMB's -89.12%.
ESOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESOA and CLMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer