ESIM vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

ESIM vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIM achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 12.96% return.

ESIM

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 7.61%
• YTD: 16.74%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIM vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESIM Eventide International ETF	16.74%	2.23%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	12.96%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIM and EFAS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

ESIM vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 81
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIM vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIM	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.01	0.56	+2.45

Drawdowns

ESIM vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIM	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-44.38%	+33.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.01%	+3.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-7.08%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESIM	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.11%	10.60%	+5.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	15.59%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.11%	18.33%	-2.22%

ESIM vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIM vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	5.05%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
ESIM Eventide International ETF	0.19%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIM and EFAS in my portfolio?

ESIM and EFAS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIM or EFAS?

On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIM or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ESIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESIM or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.19% for ESIM.

What is the main difference between ESIM and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.56% for EFAS.