ESIM vs. BKIE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while BKIE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.

Performance

ESIM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIM achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 12.14% return.

ESIM

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 15.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BKIE

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: 6.74%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 18.16%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	$7.46M	$7.01M	$6.05M
ESIM Eventide International ETF	$544.41K	$379.64K	$218.50K

ESIM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESIM Eventide International ETF	15.14%	1.26%
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	12.14%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIM and BKIE is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.86

ESIM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESIM	BKIE
Technology	11.7%	11.7%
Financial Services	10.0%	26.6%
Industrials	5.5%	17.9%
Energy	5.3%	5.0%
Healthcare	4.5%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.3%	7.2%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.8%
Basic Materials	0.9%	6.7%
Communication Services	0.7%	4.1%
Utilities	0.7%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.3%

Return for Risk

ESIM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESIM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKIE

BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 72
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESIM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESIM	BKIE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.09	—

Drawdowns

ESIM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and BKIE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIM	BKIE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-28.19%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-0.32%	-3.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-4.88%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESIM	BKIE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	15.24%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	16.22%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	16.32%	+0.64%

ESIM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than BKIE's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	3.14%	3.12%	3.31%	2.88%	2.97%	2.58%	1.49%
ESIM Eventide International ETF	1.21%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIM and BKIE in my portfolio?

ESIM and BKIE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIM or BKIE?

On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIM or BKIE?

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ESIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESIM or BKIE?

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.21% for ESIM.

What is the main difference between ESIM and BKIE?

They also come from different issuers: Eventide and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.04% for BKIE.