ESIM vs. GMOI
ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while GMOI is passively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.
Performance
ESIM vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIM achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 20.68% return.
ESIM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GMOI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 1Y
- 42.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $598.84K | $384.15K | $222.42K | |
| $8.04M | $4.71M | $3.16M |
ESIM vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 15.11% | 1.26% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 20.68% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIM and GMOI is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIM vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank
ESIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GMOI
ESIM vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESIM | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESIM vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum GMOI drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and GMOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIM | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -14.67% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -0.74% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -1.63% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
ESIM vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIM | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 13.11% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 15.37% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 15.37% | +1.64% |
ESIM vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIM vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison
ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than GMOI's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 1.21% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.65% | 2.74% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIM and GMOI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.21% for ESIM.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.60% for GMOI.
Find the right allocation for ESIM and GMOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer