ESGN vs. HDMV
ESGN (Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF) and HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESGN is passively managed, while HDMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGN returned 11.72%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for HDMV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HDMV.
Performance
ESGN vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than HDMV's 4.23% return.
ESGN
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGN vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 7.02% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.23% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 15.00% | -7.60% | 27.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGN and HDMV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ESGN and HDMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGN vs. HDMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGN
HDMV
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
ESGN
HDMV
Financial Services
ESGN
HDMV
Energy
ESGN
HDMV
Utilities
ESGN
HDMV
Technology
ESGN
HDMV
Consumer Cyclical
ESGN
HDMV
Healthcare
ESGN
HDMV
Consumer Defensive
ESGN
HDMV
Basic Materials
ESGN
HDMV
Communication Services
ESGN
HDMV
Real Estate
ESGN
HDMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGN vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank
ESGN
HDMV
ESGN vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGN | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 0.86 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 1.23 | +1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.16 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.10 | +1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 3.41 | +6.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGN | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 0.86 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.53 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.40 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ESGN vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than HDMV's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and HDMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGN | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -32.01% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -8.73% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.38% | -10.33% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -24.11% | -0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -6.05% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -6.77% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.80% | -0.21% |
Volatility
ESGN vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGN | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.83% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 9.38% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 11.16% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 12.05% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 13.24% | +3.07% |
ESGN vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGN vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison
ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than HDMV's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 9.22% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGN and HDMV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGN has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs HDMV's -32.01%.
On 5-year performance, ESGN leads with 11.72% vs 6.31% for HDMV. On fees, ESGN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 4.70% for HDMV.
They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.80% for HDMV.
ESGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGN and HDMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer