ESGN vs. XCEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM).
ESGN and XCEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGN is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. Both ESGN and XCEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ESGN vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESGN vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 6.14% | 39.85% | 6.02% | 20.88% | -5.95% | 10.18% | -0.52% | 15.83% | -18.30% | 24.88% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 7.38% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | 7.87% | 9.47% | 19.74% | -11.75% | 34.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 7.38% return.
ESGN
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- —
XCEM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGN vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESGN vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank
ESGN
XCEM
ESGN vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGN | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.14 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.82 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 3.06 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.96 | 12.61 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGN | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.14 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGN and XCEM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ESGN vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than XCEM's 3.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGN Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF | 9.30% | 9.76% | 3.11% | 3.27% | 3.57% | 3.43% | 2.64% | 3.34% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 3.03% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
ESGN vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, roughly equal to the maximum XCEM drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and XCEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGN | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.71% | -41.24% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.52% | -14.46% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.51% | -29.67% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -10.16% | +5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -8.70% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.51% | -0.87% |
Volatility
ESGN vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) is 6.51%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that ESGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESGN | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 10.37% | -3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 15.60% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 20.21% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 17.15% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 19.53% | -3.20% |