PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGN vs. REVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGN vs. REVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGN achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than REVS's 11.52% return.


ESGN

1D
0.54%
1M
0.78%
YTD
8.09%
6M
11.60%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*

REVS

1D
0.51%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.52%
6M
13.45%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGN vs. REVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
8.09%39.85%6.02%20.88%-5.95%10.18%-0.52%6.66%
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
11.52%16.80%16.36%13.46%-6.20%28.52%1.37%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGN and REVS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.68

The correlation between ESGN and REVS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGN vs. REVS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGN
REVS

Industrials

15.8%
12.1%

Financial Services

15.4%
20.7%

Energy

13.0%
6.5%

Utilities

9.3%
4.4%

Technology

7.0%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.6%

Healthcare

3.9%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.5%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.0%

Communication Services

1.2%
8.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
4.3%

Industrials

ESGN
15.8%
REVS
12.1%

Financial Services

ESGN
15.4%
REVS
20.7%

Energy

ESGN
13.0%
REVS
6.5%

Utilities

ESGN
9.3%
REVS
4.4%

Technology

ESGN
7.0%
REVS
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGN
6.6%
REVS
7.6%

Healthcare

ESGN
3.9%
REVS
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

ESGN
3.5%
REVS
7.5%

Basic Materials

ESGN
1.9%
REVS
4.0%

Communication Services

ESGN
1.2%
REVS
8.4%

Real Estate

ESGN
0.2%
REVS
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGN vs. REVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGN
ESGN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ESGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

REVS
REVS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
REVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
REVS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
REVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
REVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGN vs. REVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGNREVSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

2.38

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

3.42

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.93

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.64

14.38

-3.74

ESGN vs. REVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the REVS Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGN and REVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGNREVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.38

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.76

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.68

-0.07

Drawdowns

ESGN vs. REVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGN drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than REVS's maximum drawdown of -37.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGN and REVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGNREVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-37.85%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-6.94%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.38%

-16.37%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-18.04%

-6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-0.04%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-4.66%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.90%

+0.68%

Volatility

ESGN vs. REVS - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF (ESGN) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) at 2.88%. This indicates that ESGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGNREVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.88%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

8.47%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

11.50%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

14.91%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

19.13%

-2.82%

ESGN vs. REVS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than REVS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGN vs. REVS - Dividend Comparison

ESGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, more than REVS's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGN
Columbia Sustainable International Equity Income ETF
9.13%9.76%3.11%3.27%3.57%3.43%2.64%3.34%7.25%4.63%2.52%
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
1.91%2.13%1.89%2.49%2.46%1.18%27.75%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGN and REVS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGN has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to REVS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGN dropped -41.71% vs REVS's -37.85%.

On 5-year performance, ESGN leads with 12.09% vs 11.22% for REVS. On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, REVS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGN has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ESGN.

ESGN has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 1.91% for REVS.

ESGN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while REVS is Large Cap Value Equities. ESGN tracks MSCI Beta ADV Sust Intl Equity Income 100, while REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ESGN and 0.19% for REVS.

REVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGN and REVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer