ESEA vs. INSM
ESEA (Euroseas Ltd) and INSM (Insmed Incorporated) are both stocks. ESEA operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while INSM operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, ESEA returned 23.25%/yr vs 24.71%/yr for INSM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESEA vs. INSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESEA achieves a 25.78% return, which is significantly higher than INSM's -43.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ESEA has underperformed INSM with an annualized return of 23.25%, while INSM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.71% annualized return.
ESEA
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -7.24%
- YTD
- 25.78%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 72.75%
- 3Y*
- 77.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.80%
- 10Y*
- 23.25%
INSM
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -43.09%
- 6M
- -48.99%
- 1Y
- 40.12%
- 3Y*
- 71.02%
- 5Y*
- 27.78%
- 10Y*
- 24.71%
ESEA vs. INSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 25.78% | 140.95% | 23.60% | 83.39% | -21.02% | 358.75% | 33.42% | -27.32% | -58.82% | 0.59% |
INSM Insmed Incorporated | -43.09% | 152.09% | 122.78% | 55.11% | -26.65% | -18.17% | 39.41% | 82.01% | -57.92% | 135.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESEA and INSM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
ESEA:
$468.95M
INSM:
$21.34B
ESEA:
$18.99
INSM:
-$5.71
ESEA:
2.06
INSM:
25.07
ESEA:
0.96
INSM:
30.28
ESEA:
$227.36M
INSM:
$819.56M
ESEA:
$148.47M
INSM:
$668.55M
ESEA:
$165.74M
INSM:
-$1.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESEA vs. INSM — Risk / Return Rank
ESEA
INSM
ESEA vs. INSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and Insmed Incorporated (INSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESEA | INSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 0.73 | +3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 1.76 | +6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESEA | INSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 0.68 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.38 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.32 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | -0.02 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ESEA vs. INSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESEA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum INSM drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA and INSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESEA | INSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -98.65% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.36% | -55.46% | +37.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.00% | -55.46% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | -55.46% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.54% | -64.84% | -30.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.23% | -53.15% | -34.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -86.09% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 22.91% | -14.00% |
Volatility
ESEA vs. INSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) is 17.94%, while Insmed Incorporated (INSM) has a volatility of 19.09%. This indicates that ESEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESEA | INSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.94% | 19.09% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.13% | 45.36% | -12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.42% | 59.33% | -14.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.23% | 72.79% | -17.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.54% | 78.48% | +16.06% |
Dividends
ESEA vs. INSM - Dividend Comparison
ESEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, while INSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 5.37% | 16.23% | 6.63% | 6.42% | 8.13% |
INSM Insmed Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESEA vs. INSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Euroseas Ltd and Insmed Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESEA vs. INSM - Profitability Comparison
ESEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.73M and revenue of 55.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
INSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported a gross profit of 258.54M and revenue of 305.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.5%.
ESEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 34.03M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.
INSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported an operating income of -198.20M and revenue of 305.96M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.8%.
ESEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 32.52M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.
INSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported a net income of -163.56M and revenue of 305.96M, resulting in a net margin of -53.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESEA and INSM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INSM has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to ESEA (17.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESEA dropped -99.84% vs INSM's -98.65%.
ESEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESEA and INSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer