PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEA vs. FG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESEA vs. FG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEA achieves a 20.89% return, which is significantly higher than FG's -15.05% return.


ESEA

1D
-0.85%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
20.89%
6M
8.14%
1Y
75.89%
3Y*
76.89%
5Y*
51.62%
10Y*
23.65%

FG

1D
-5.71%
1M
-8.57%
YTD
-15.05%
6M
-20.92%
1Y
-17.86%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEA vs. FG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd
20.89%140.95%23.60%83.39%-5.90%
FG
F&G Annuities & Life Inc.
-15.05%-23.60%-7.98%137.11%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA and FG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESEA:

$456.16M

FG:

$3.60B

EPS

ESEA:

$18.99

FG:

$3.85

PE Ratio

ESEA:

3.44

FG:

6.73

PEG Ratio

ESEA:

0.08

FG:

0.12

PS Ratio

ESEA:

2.00

FG:

0.61

PB Ratio

ESEA:

0.93

FG:

0.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESEA:

$227.36M

FG:

$5.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESEA:

$148.47M

FG:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

ESEA:

$165.74M

FG:

$1.52B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEA vs. FG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA
ESEA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ESEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FG
FG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA vs. FG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEAFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.94

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

-0.44

+4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

-1.04

+9.69

ESEA vs. FG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the FG Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA and FG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEAFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

-0.49

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.28

-0.39

Drawdowns

ESEA vs. FG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than FG's maximum drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA and FG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEAFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-56.24%

-43.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.36%

-40.92%

+22.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.00%

-56.24%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.73%

-44.57%

-43.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.42%

-19.29%

-66.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

17.22%

-8.42%

Volatility

ESEA vs. FG - Volatility Comparison

Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a higher volatility of 19.25% compared to F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) at 13.14%. This indicates that ESEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEAFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.25%

13.14%

+6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.17%

30.99%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.51%

36.25%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.82%

43.47%

+13.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.56%

43.47%

+51.09%

Dividends

ESEA vs. FG - Dividend Comparison

ESEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than FG's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd
4.29%16.23%6.63%6.42%8.13%
FG
F&G Annuities & Life Inc.
3.63%2.95%2.05%1.76%0.00%

Financials

ESEA vs. FG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Euroseas Ltd and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
55.84M
1.19B
(ESEA) Total Revenue
(FG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESEA vs. FG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Euroseas Ltd and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
0
Portfolio components
ESEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.73M and revenue of 55.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

FG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, F&G Annuities & Life Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ESEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 34.03M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.

FG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, F&G Annuities & Life Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ESEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 32.52M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.

FG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, F&G Annuities & Life Inc. reported a net income of 244.00M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESEA and FG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESEA has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to FG (13.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESEA dropped -99.84% vs FG's -56.24%.

ESEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEA and FG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer