ESEA vs. BAC
ESEA (Euroseas Ltd) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. ESEA operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ESEA returned 21.65%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for BAC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ESEA vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESEA achieves a 48.02% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ESEA has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 21.65%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 18.54% annualized return.
ESEA
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 18.92%
- 6M
- 41.34%
- YTD
- 48.02%
- 1Y
- 60.67%
- 3Y*
- 86.10%
- 5Y*
- 52.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.65%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.90%
BAC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 38.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.02B | $2.04B | $2.03B | |
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | $3.42M | $3.48M | $4.33M |
ESEA vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 48.02% | 140.95% | 23.60% | 83.39% | -21.02% | 358.75% | 33.42% | -27.32% | -58.82% | 0.59% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 13.86% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESEA and BAC is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
ESEA:
$556.95M
BAC:
$439.63B
ESEA:
$18.97
BAC:
$4.50
ESEA:
4.16
BAC:
13.75
ESEA:
0.09
BAC:
5.52
ESEA:
2.43
BAC:
2.61
ESEA:
1.12
BAC:
1.64
ESEA:
$227.36M
BAC:
$177.58B
ESEA:
$148.47M
BAC:
$115.79B
ESEA:
$165.74M
BAC:
$45.64B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESEA vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
ESEA
BAC
ESEA vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESEA | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 1.90 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 5.00 | +1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESEA vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESEA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than BAC's maximum drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESEA | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -93.10% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.36% | -17.93% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.00% | -27.51% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | -46.64% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.54% | -48.95% | -46.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.97% | -1.07% | -83.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.41% | -28.21% | -57.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 6.82% | +2.37% |
Volatility
ESEA vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.89%. This indicates that ESEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESEA | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 5.89% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.23% | 16.31% | +16.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 21.85% | +22.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.27% | 26.67% | +27.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.69% | 30.46% | +63.23% |
Dividends
ESEA vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
ESEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than BAC's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 1.81% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 3.74% | 16.23% | 6.63% | 6.42% | 8.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESEA vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Euroseas Ltd and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESEA vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison
ESEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.73M and revenue of 55.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 30.19B and revenue of 49.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
ESEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 34.03M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 11.57B and revenue of 49.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
ESEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 32.52M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 9.07B and revenue of 49.39B, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESEA and BAC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESEA has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to BAC (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESEA dropped -99.84% vs BAC's -93.10%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESEA and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer