PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESEA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESEA vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd
24.81%140.95%23.60%83.39%-21.02%358.75%33.42%-27.32%-58.82%0.59%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESEA achieves a 24.81% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ESEA has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 24.59%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


ESEA

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
24.81%
6M
13.53%
1Y
121.97%
3Y*
87.84%
5Y*
68.17%
10Y*
24.59%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEA vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA
ESEA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ESEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEA^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.82

0.92

+1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

1.41

+1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.10

1.41

+5.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.04

6.61

+8.43

ESEA vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEA^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

0.92

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.61

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.68

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.46

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA and ^GSPC is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

ESEA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEA^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.84%

-56.78%

-43.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.36%

-12.14%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.28%

-25.43%

-25.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.54%

-33.92%

-61.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.33%

-5.78%

-81.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.40%

-10.75%

-74.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.67%

2.60%

+6.07%

Volatility

ESEA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ESEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESEA^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.94%

5.37%

+12.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.08%

9.55%

+22.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.59%

18.33%

+25.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.92%

16.90%

+43.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.56%

18.05%

+77.51%