ESEA vs. SBLK
ESEA (Euroseas Ltd) and SBLK (Star Bulk Carriers Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, ESEA returned 23.65%/yr vs 29.02%/yr for SBLK. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESEA vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESEA achieves a 20.89% return, which is significantly lower than SBLK's 43.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ESEA has underperformed SBLK with an annualized return of 23.65%, while SBLK has yielded a comparatively higher 29.02% annualized return.
ESEA
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 20.89%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 75.89%
- 3Y*
- 76.89%
- 5Y*
- 51.62%
- 10Y*
- 23.65%
SBLK
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 43.61%
- 6M
- 35.97%
- 1Y
- 72.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.30%
- 10Y*
- 29.02%
ESEA vs. SBLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 20.89% | 140.95% | 23.60% | 83.39% | -21.02% | 358.75% | 33.42% | -27.32% | -58.82% | 0.59% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 43.61% | 30.76% | -21.04% | 19.24% | 8.50% | 185.15% | -24.77% | 29.82% | -18.83% | 120.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESEA and SBLK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.31 |
The correlation between ESEA and SBLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESEA:
$456.16M
SBLK:
$3.04B
ESEA:
$18.99
SBLK:
$1.25
ESEA:
3.44
SBLK:
21.78
ESEA:
2.00
SBLK:
2.83
ESEA:
0.93
SBLK:
1.25
ESEA:
$227.36M
SBLK:
$1.09B
ESEA:
$148.47M
SBLK:
$377.07M
ESEA:
$165.74M
SBLK:
$377.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESEA vs. SBLK — Risk / Return Rank
ESEA
SBLK
ESEA vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESEA | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 4.15 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 11.58 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESEA | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 2.47 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.47 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | -0.18 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
ESEA vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESEA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA and SBLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESEA | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.84% | -99.76% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.36% | -17.49% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.00% | -48.44% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | -48.44% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.54% | -73.77% | -21.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.73% | -93.52% | +5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.42% | -82.69% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 6.26% | +2.54% |
Volatility
ESEA vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison
Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a higher volatility of 19.25% compared to Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) at 9.70%. This indicates that ESEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESEA | SBLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.25% | 9.70% | +9.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.17% | 23.24% | +9.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.51% | 29.47% | +15.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.82% | 43.48% | +13.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.56% | 52.73% | +41.83% |
Dividends
ESEA vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison
ESEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than SBLK's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 4.29% | 16.23% | 6.63% | 6.42% | 8.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp. | 2.13% | 1.56% | 16.72% | 7.38% | 33.80% | 9.93% | 0.57% | 0.42% |
Financials
ESEA vs. SBLK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Euroseas Ltd and Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESEA vs. SBLK - Profitability Comparison
ESEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.73M and revenue of 55.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
SBLK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 92.95M and revenue of 281.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.
ESEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 34.03M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.
SBLK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 73.02M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.0%.
ESEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 32.52M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.
SBLK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 58.53M and revenue of 281.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESEA and SBLK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESEA has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to SBLK (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESEA dropped -99.84% vs SBLK's -99.76%.
SBLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESEA and SBLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer