ESEA vs. SBLK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).

Performance

ESEA vs. SBLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESEA vs. SBLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESEA Euroseas Ltd	24.81%	140.95%	23.60%	83.39%	-21.02%	358.75%	33.42%	-27.32%	-58.82%	0.59%
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp.	25.00%	30.76%	-21.04%	19.24%	8.50%	185.15%	-24.77%	29.82%	-18.83%	120.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ESEA : $471.03M SBLK : $2.70B
EPS ESEA : $19.64 SBLK : $0.73
PE Ratio ESEA : 3.43 SBLK : 32.25
PS Ratio ESEA : 2.06 SBLK : 2.60
PB Ratio ESEA : 1.02 SBLK : 1.10
Total Revenue (TTM) ESEA : $227.87M SBLK : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) ESEA : $144.75M SBLK : $344.33M
EBITDA (TTM) ESEA : $170.58M SBLK : $318.33M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESEA having a 24.81% return and SBLK slightly higher at 25.00%. Over the past 10 years, ESEA has underperformed SBLK with an annualized return of 24.59%, while SBLK has yielded a comparatively higher 27.31% annualized return.

ESEA

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 24.81%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 121.97%
• 3Y*: 87.84%
• 5Y*: 68.17%
• 10Y*: 24.59%

SBLK

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -10.65%
• YTD: 25.00%
• 6M: 29.03%
• 1Y: 54.54%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 23.74%
• 10Y*: 27.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ESEA vs. SBLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEA

ESEA Risk / Return Rank: 94
ESEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ESEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ESEA Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ESEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ESEA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SBLK

SBLK Risk / Return Rank: 82
SBLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SBLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SBLK Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SBLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SBLK Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEA vs. SBLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESEA	SBLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	1.57	+1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.04	+1.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.28	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.10	2.88	+4.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.04	8.24	+6.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESEA vs. SBLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the SBLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEA and SBLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESEA	SBLK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	1.57	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.14	0.53	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.51	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	-0.20	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between ESEA and SBLK is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ESEA vs. SBLK - Dividend Comparison

ESEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than SBLK's 2.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ESEA Euroseas Ltd	4.16%	16.23%	6.63%	6.42%	8.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers Corp.	2.45%	1.56%	16.72%	7.38%	33.80%	9.93%	0.57%	0.42%

Drawdowns

ESEA vs. SBLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEA drawdown since its inception was -99.84%, roughly equal to the maximum SBLK drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEA and SBLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESEA	SBLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.84%	-99.76%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.36%	-19.11%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.28%	-48.44%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.54%	-73.77%	-21.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.33%	-94.36%	+7.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.40%	-82.59%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.67%	6.81%	+1.86%

Volatility

ESEA vs. SBLK - Volatility Comparison

Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) at 11.72%. This indicates that ESEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESEA	SBLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.94%	11.72%	+6.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.08%	22.65%	+9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.59%	34.90%	+8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.92%	45.05%	+14.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.56%	53.71%	+41.85%

Financials

ESEA vs. SBLK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Euroseas Ltd and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ESEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 38.44M and revenue of 57.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

SBLK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a gross profit of 104.73M and revenue of 300.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

ESEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 33.93M and revenue of 57.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.1%.

SBLK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported an operating income of 81.66M and revenue of 300.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.2%.

ESEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 40.49M and revenue of 57.39M, resulting in a net margin of 70.6%.

SBLK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. reported a net income of 65.15M and revenue of 300.59M, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.