ESBG vs. MATE
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.
Performance
ESBG vs. MATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 16.71% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | -2.86% | -0.06% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 16.71% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and MATE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than MATE's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and MATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -13.24% | -5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.63% | -3.44% | -14.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -3.43% | -4.31% |
Volatility
ESBG vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.71% | 22.64% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 22.64% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 22.64% | +3.07% |
ESBG vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 1.12% | 0.24% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and MATE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESBG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESBG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.97% for MATE.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and MATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer