ESBG vs. MATE
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.
Performance
ESBG vs. MATE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 16.80% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- -2.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MATE
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 16.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.83K | $6.10K | $15.77K | |
| $292.25K | $229.16K | $177.20K |
ESBG vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | -2.79% | -0.06% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 16.80% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and MATE is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than MATE's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and MATE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -13.24% | -5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.57% | -3.36% | -14.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -3.49% | -5.03% |
Volatility
ESBG vs. MATE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | MATE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.17% | 22.45% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 22.45% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 22.45% | +2.72% |
ESBG vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 1.12% | 0.24% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and MATE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESBG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESBG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.97% for MATE.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and MATE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer