MATE vs. MEMA
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and MEMA (Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MATE is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Man Group, while MEMA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Man Group. Both are actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MEMA.
Performance
MATE vs. MEMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MATE achieves a 16.80% return, which is significantly higher than MEMA's 14.29% return.
MATE
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 16.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MEMA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $292.25K | $229.16K | $177.20K | |
| $715.98K | $516.31K | $304.18K |
MATE vs. MEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 16.80% | 2.65% |
MEMA Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF | 14.29% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and MEMA is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. MEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF (MEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. MEMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum MEMA drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and MEMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | MEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -14.73% | +1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -10.80% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -3.90% | +0.41% |
Volatility
MATE vs. MEMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | MEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 28.54% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 28.54% | -6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 28.54% | -6.09% |
MATE vs. MEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MEMA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. MEMA - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% |
MEMA Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and MEMA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEMA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEMA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
MEMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
MATE is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while MEMA is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.85% for MEMA.
Find the right allocation for MATE and MEMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer