MATE vs. XXX
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. MATE is actively managed, while XXX is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for XXX.
Performance
MATE vs. XXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MATE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 17.50%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. XXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 5.14% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | -4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and XXX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. XXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. XXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, roughly equal to the maximum XXX drawdown of -13.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and XXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | XXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -13.06% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -6.69% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -5.50% | +2.17% |
Volatility
MATE vs. XXX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | XXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.97% | 24.35% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 24.35% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 24.35% | -1.38% |
MATE vs. XXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than XXX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. XXX - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and XXX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XXX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XXX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
XXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and Cyber Hornet. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.95% for XXX.
Find the right allocation for MATE and XXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer