MATE vs. WIMA
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. MATE is actively managed, while WIMA is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for WIMA.
Performance
MATE vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MATE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 17.50%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 3.58% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and WIMA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and WIMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -3.33% | -9.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -0.16% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -0.92% | -2.41% |
Volatility
MATE vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.97% | 16.28% | +6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 16.28% | +6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 16.28% | +6.69% |
MATE vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither MATE nor WIMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and WIMA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
MATE and WIMA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.42% for WIMA.
Find the right allocation for MATE and WIMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer