MATE vs. WAMA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. MATE is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.

Performance

MATE vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MATE

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 17.50%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WAMA

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATE vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	3.58%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MATE and WAMA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.77

Return for Risk

MATE vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

MATE vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -4.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and WAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MATE	WAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	-4.37%	-8.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-2.01%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-1.06%	-2.27%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MATE	WAMA	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.97%	14.02%	+8.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.97%	14.02%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	14.02%	+8.95%

MATE vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

MATE vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MATE nor WAMA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MATE and WAMA in my portfolio?

MATE and WAMA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MATE or WAMA?

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MATE or WAMA?

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MATE or WAMA?

MATE and WAMA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MATE and WAMA?

They also come from different issuers: Man Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.32% for WAMA.