ESBG vs. THIR
ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) and THIR (THOR Index Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ESBG is actively managed, while THIR is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESBG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for THIR.
Performance
ESBG vs. THIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESBG achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than THIR's 7.85% return.
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THIR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG vs. THIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 5.96% | 5.72% |
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF | 7.85% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESBG and THIR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESBG vs. THIR — Risk / Return Rank
ESBG
THIR
ESBG vs. THIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESBG | THIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.73 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
ESBG vs. THIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESBG drawdown since its inception was -18.84%, which is greater than THIR's maximum drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESBG and THIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESBG | THIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -10.05% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -0.71% | -9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -1.98% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
ESBG vs. THIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESBG | THIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 11.56% | +13.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 12.62% | +12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 12.62% | +12.57% |
ESBG vs. THIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESBG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than THIR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESBG vs. THIR - Dividend Comparison
ESBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than THIR's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESBG and THIR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THIR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THIR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
ESBG has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.33% for THIR.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ESBG and 0.70% for THIR.
Find the right allocation for ESBG and THIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer