GDT vs. MOOD
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.
Performance
GDT vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOOD
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 33.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.30% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and MOOD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MOOD
GDT vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and MOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -14.34% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.49% | -2.57% | -19.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -2.31% | -8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.99% | 14.69% | +18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 12.18% | +20.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 12.18% | +20.81% |
GDT vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and MOOD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.73% for MOOD.
Find the right allocation for GDT and MOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer