PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQT vs. SE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQT vs. SE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EQT Corporation (EQT) and Sea Limited (SE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly higher than SE's -34.98% return.


EQT

1D
1.45%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
-5.35%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
19.29%
10Y*
3.39%

SE

1D
-3.21%
1M
-11.31%
YTD
-34.98%
6M
-33.66%
1Y
-46.36%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
-21.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQT vs. SE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQT
EQT Corporation
-2.55%17.64%21.41%16.20%57.64%71.60%17.27%-41.82%-38.82%-9.69%
SE
Sea Limited
-34.98%20.24%161.98%-22.16%-76.74%12.39%394.90%255.30%-15.08%-17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EQT and SE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.16

The correlation between EQT and SE shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQT:

$32.47B

SE:

$52.76B

EPS

EQT:

$5.40

SE:

$2.57

PE Ratio

EQT:

9.61

SE:

32.21

PEG Ratio

EQT:

0.08

SE:

0.15

PS Ratio

EQT:

3.21

SE:

2.06

PB Ratio

EQT:

1.29

SE:

4.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQT:

$10.03B

SE:

$25.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQT:

$6.43B

SE:

$11.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQT:

$7.48B

SE:

$2.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQT vs. SE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQT
EQT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SE
SE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQT vs. SE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Sea Limited (SE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQTSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.83

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

-0.77

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

-1.27

+0.80

EQT vs. SE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQT Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the SE Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQT and SE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQT vs. SE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SE drawdown of -90.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and SE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQTSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.51%

-90.51%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.42%

-60.22%

+35.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-60.22%

+28.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.56%

-90.51%

+47.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.32%

-77.40%

+54.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-44.10%

+20.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.47%

36.57%

-25.10%

Volatility

EQT vs. SE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.36%, while Sea Limited (SE) has a volatility of 14.69%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQTSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

14.69%

-6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

38.05%

-16.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.56%

50.74%

-18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.79%

64.13%

-21.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.90%

62.59%

-13.69%

Dividends

EQT vs. SE - Dividend Comparison

EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while SE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.26%1.19%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%0.42%0.21%0.18%0.23%
SE
Sea Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EQT vs. SE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Sea Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
3.38B
7.10B
(EQT) Total Revenue
(SE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQT vs. SE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EQT Corporation and Sea Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.4%
44.3%
Portfolio components
EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

SE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

SE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.

SE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQT and SE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SE has higher volatility (14.69%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs SE's -90.51%.

EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQT and SE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer