PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sea Limited (SE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SE
Sea Limited
-35.60%20.24%161.98%-22.16%-76.74%12.39%394.90%255.30%-15.08%-18.02%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-4.76%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%4.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -35.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -4.76% return.


SE

1D
-0.78%
1M
-21.91%
YTD
-35.60%
6M
-54.86%
1Y
-37.97%
3Y*
-1.72%
5Y*
-19.06%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
-4.76%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
18.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE
SE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

1.07

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.89

1.66

-2.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.24

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

2.00

-2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.36

7.32

-8.68

SE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SE Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SE and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

1.07

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.59

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.38

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SE and QQQ is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SE
Sea Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.48%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

SE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.51%

-82.97%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.22%

-12.62%

-47.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.51%

-35.12%

-55.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.61%

-7.86%

-69.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.36%

-32.99%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.31%

3.44%

+23.87%

Volatility

SE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Sea Limited (SE) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.61%. This indicates that SE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.95%

6.61%

+8.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.91%

12.82%

+24.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.29%

22.70%

+29.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.17%

22.38%

+41.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.82%

22.25%

+40.57%