PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sea Limited (SE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -30.20% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return.


SE

1D
-2.45%
1M
2.03%
YTD
-30.20%
6M
-28.64%
1Y
-41.96%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
-20.53%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SE
Sea Limited
-30.20%20.24%161.98%-22.16%-76.74%12.39%394.90%255.30%-15.08%-17.97%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SE and QQQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.51

The correlation between SE and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE
SE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.41

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

3.44

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

12.79

-13.91

SE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SE Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SE and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.51%

-82.97%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.22%

-11.96%

-48.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.22%

-22.77%

-37.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.51%

-35.12%

-55.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.74%

-0.99%

-74.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.17%

-32.73%

-11.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.38%

3.21%

+34.17%

Volatility

SE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Sea Limited (SE) has a higher volatility of 15.33% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that SE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.33%

8.47%

+6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.25%

14.20%

+24.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.25%

17.67%

+33.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.23%

22.64%

+41.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.56%

22.43%

+40.13%

Dividends

SE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SE
Sea Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SE has higher volatility (15.33%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SE dropped -90.51% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SE and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer