EQT vs. AUGO
EQT (EQT Corporation) and AUGO (Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares) are both stocks. EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while AUGO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, EQT returned 0.30% vs 133.89% for AUGO. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EQT vs. AUGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than AUGO's 10.23% return.
EQT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 0.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 25.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.26%
AUGO
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 133.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 125.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.08M | $50.97M | $65.65M | |
| $436.52M | $391.65M | $390.40M |
EQT vs. AUGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | -0.02% | -7.41% |
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares | 10.23% | 111.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and AUGO is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
EQT:
$33.33B
AUGO:
$4.57B
EQT:
$4.55
AUGO:
$1.08
EQT:
11.71
AUGO:
50.68
EQT:
3.59
AUGO:
3.95
EQT:
1.32
AUGO:
14.95
EQT:
$9.29B
AUGO:
$1.14B
EQT:
$6.78B
AUGO:
$644.49M
EQT:
$6.93B
AUGO:
$394.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQT vs. AUGO — Risk / Return Rank
EQT
AUGO
EQT vs. AUGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQT | AUGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.29 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.51 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 6.15 | -6.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQT vs. AUGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than AUGO's maximum drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and AUGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQT | AUGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -53.65% | -37.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -53.65% | +25.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.33% | -49.48% | +28.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -13.88% | -9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.69% | 21.85% | -9.16% |
Volatility
EQT vs. AUGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 10.22%, while Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) has a volatility of 25.65%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQT | AUGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 25.65% | -15.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.66% | 59.99% | -39.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 70.43% | -39.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.13% | 69.38% | -27.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.96% | 69.38% | -20.42% |
Dividends
EQT vs. AUGO - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than AUGO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares | 4.12% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.22% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
EQT vs. AUGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQT vs. AUGO - Profitability Comparison
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.
AUGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a gross profit of 193.50M and revenue of 382.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 394.04M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
AUGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported an operating income of 172.35M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 281.45M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
AUGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a net income of 95.16M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQT and AUGO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AUGO has higher volatility (25.65%) compared to EQT (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs AUGO's -53.65%.
AUGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQT and AUGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer