AUGO vs. URC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) and Uranium Royalty Corp (URC.TO).
Performance
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares | 74.70% | 113.25% |
URC.TO Uranium Royalty Corp | 5.16% | 37.91% |
Different Trading Currencies
AUGO is traded in USD, while URC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the URC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
AUGO:
$7.23B
URC.TO:
CA$731.72M
AUGO:
-$0.99
URC.TO:
CA$0.03
AUGO:
7.61
URC.TO:
12.84
AUGO:
27.20
URC.TO:
1.92
AUGO:
$921.73M
URC.TO:
CA$54.60M
AUGO:
$526.82M
URC.TO:
CA$8.92M
AUGO:
$552.62M
URC.TO:
CA$5.26M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUGO achieves a 74.70% return, which is significantly higher than URC.TO's 5.16% return.
AUGO
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 74.70%
- 6M
- 141.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URC.TO
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- -12.98%
- 1Y
- 103.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGO vs. URC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AUGO
URC.TO
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) and Uranium Royalty Corp (URC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUGO | URC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.29 | 0.35 | +7.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGO and URC.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Dividend Comparison
AUGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while URC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares | 1.68% | 1.61% |
URC.TO Uranium Royalty Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUGO drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, smaller than the maximum URC.TO drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGO and URC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGO | URC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.42% | -71.83% | +40.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -71.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -30.31% | +28.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -36.06% | +30.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.03% | — |
Volatility
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUGO | URC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.96% | 77.02% | -12.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.96% | 72.48% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.96% | 69.74% | -4.78% |
Financials
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares and Uranium Royalty Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AUGO vs. URC.TO - Profitability Comparison
AUGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a gross profit of 200.30M and revenue of 321.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
URC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Uranium Royalty Corp reported a gross profit of 4.18M and revenue of 16.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
AUGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported an operating income of 181.54M and revenue of 321.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 56.4%.
URC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Uranium Royalty Corp reported an operating income of 2.93M and revenue of 16.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
AUGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a net income of -19.86M and revenue of 321.66M, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
URC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Uranium Royalty Corp reported a net income of 1.96M and revenue of 16.66M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.