EQAL vs. VO
EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EQAL tracks the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQAL returned 10.66%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
EQAL vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.66%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
EQAL
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
VO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
EQAL vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 12.35% | 11.05% | 11.38% | 11.98% | -13.49% | 23.14% | 16.57% | 24.54% | -9.22% | 17.36% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.05% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQAL and VO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EQAL and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQAL vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQAL
VO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
EQAL
VO
Industrials
EQAL
VO
Financial Services
EQAL
VO
Healthcare
EQAL
VO
Energy
EQAL
VO
Real Estate
EQAL
VO
Consumer Defensive
EQAL
VO
Basic Materials
EQAL
VO
Utilities
EQAL
VO
Consumer Cyclical
EQAL
VO
Communication Services
EQAL
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQAL vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
EQAL
VO
EQAL vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQAL | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 1.48 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.14 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.23 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 8.50 | +4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQAL | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.48 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EQAL vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQAL | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.44% | -58.87% | +18.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -8.17% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -19.02% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.79% | -27.57% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | -39.37% | -1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.45% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -7.86% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.14% | -0.25% |
Volatility
EQAL vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 3.05% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQAL | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.99% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 9.21% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 12.34% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 17.59% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 18.95% | -0.07% |
EQAL vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQAL vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 1.64% | 1.79% | 1.62% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.32% | 1.63% | 1.61% | 1.62% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.64% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, EQAL and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EQAL has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.55% vs 10.66% for EQAL. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQAL.
EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.03% for VO.
EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQAL and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer