PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQAL vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQAL vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.52%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


EQAL

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.32%
6M
9.29%
YTD
13.65%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
9.47%

VO

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.55%
6M
10.12%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
11.50%
ALL TIME*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.64M$1.88M
$194.51M$293.72M$235.90M

EQAL vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
13.65%11.05%11.38%11.98%-13.49%23.14%16.57%24.54%-9.22%17.36%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
12.35%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and VO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2014

0.94

The correlation between EQAL and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQAL vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQAL
VO

Technology

14.2%
18.2%

Industrials

10.4%
19.9%

Healthcare

10.3%
7.8%

Real Estate

9.3%
5.1%

Financial Services

9.1%
13.1%

Utilities

8.4%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
4.6%

Energy

8.0%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
9.0%

Basic Materials

7.4%
3.9%

Communication Services

6.8%
2.7%

Technology

EQAL
14.2%
VO
18.2%

Industrials

EQAL
10.4%
VO
19.9%

Healthcare

EQAL
10.3%
VO
7.8%

Real Estate

EQAL
9.3%
VO
5.1%

Financial Services

EQAL
9.1%
VO
13.1%

Utilities

EQAL
8.4%
VO
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

EQAL
8.3%
VO
4.6%

Energy

EQAL
8.0%
VO
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EQAL
7.9%
VO
9.0%

Basic Materials

EQAL
7.4%
VO
3.9%

Communication Services

EQAL
6.8%
VO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQAL vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EQAL
EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EQAL vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQALVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.83

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

6.99

+4.59

EQAL vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQALVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.44%

-58.87%

+18.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-8.17%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-19.02%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.79%

-27.57%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-39.37%

-1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.49%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-7.81%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.13%

-0.29%

Volatility

EQAL vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) has a higher volatility of 2.24% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.09%. This indicates that EQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQALVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

2.09%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

9.44%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

12.61%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.59%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.86%

-0.08%

EQAL vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQAL vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than VO's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
1.69%1.79%1.62%1.88%1.95%1.32%1.63%1.61%1.62%1.18%1.57%1.64%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.32%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EQAL and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EQAL has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to VO (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.50% vs 10.52% for EQAL. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQAL.

EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.32% for VO.

EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.03% for VO.

EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQAL and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer