EQAL vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQAL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQAL returned 10.74%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for XLG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

EQAL vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 10.74%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.

EQAL

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 14.42%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 10.74%

XLG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 8.82%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 30.80%
• 3Y*: 24.94%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 17.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	13.17%	11.05%	11.38%	11.98%	-13.49%	23.14%	16.57%	24.54%	-9.22%	17.36%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.82%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and XLG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between EQAL and XLG has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EQAL vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQAL	XLG
Technology	14.8%	43.9%
Industrials	9.5%	1.9%
Financial Services	9.4%	9.6%
Healthcare	9.4%	7.0%
Energy	9.1%	2.7%
Real Estate	9.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	5.8%
Basic Materials	8.0%	0.6%
Utilities	7.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	11.3%
Communication Services	7.2%	17.1%

Return for Risk

EQAL vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL

EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 68
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 62
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQAL	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.33	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.14	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.41	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	2.55	+1.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	9.60	+4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQAL vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQAL	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.33	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.90	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.93	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.63	-0.11

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQAL	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-52.39%	+11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-12.41%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	-20.70%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.79%	-28.02%	+6.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-30.46%	-9.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.29%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-7.64%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	3.30%	-1.41%

Volatility

EQAL vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQAL	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	2.92%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.59%	9.73%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	13.28%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	18.68%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	18.84%	+0.04%

EQAL vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EQAL and XLG have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EQAL vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than XLG's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	1.63%	1.79%	1.62%	1.88%	1.95%	1.32%	1.63%	1.61%	1.62%	1.18%	1.57%	1.64%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.59%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQAL and XLG in my portfolio?

EQAL and XLG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQAL or XLG?

EQAL has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to XLG (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, EQAL or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.41% vs 10.74% for EQAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQAL or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQAL or XLG?

EQAL and XLG have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQAL or XLG?

EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.59% for XLG.

What is the main difference between EQAL and XLG?

EQAL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.