EQAL vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
EQAL and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQAL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Dec 23, 2014. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both EQAL and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQAL or XLG.
Performance
EQAL vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 30.11% return.
EQAL
14.41%
0.48%
8.90%
25.47%
10.70%
N/A
XLG
30.11%
0.83%
13.36%
35.37%
18.26%
14.84%
Key characteristics
| EQAL | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.04 | 2.39 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.83 | 3.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.05 | 3.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.02 | 12.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.18% | 2.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.87% | 14.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.44% | -52.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.18% | -2.09% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQAL vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EQAL and XLG have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between EQAL and XLG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQAL vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQAL vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than XLG's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.32% | 1.63% | 1.62% | 1.63% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.73% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
EQAL vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQAL vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) is 3.78%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that EQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.