PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQAL vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQAL vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 10.74%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.


EQAL

1D
0.80%
1M
2.00%
YTD
13.17%
6M
14.42%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
10.74%

RSP

1D
0.40%
1M
3.56%
YTD
10.12%
6M
11.44%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
13.17%11.05%11.38%11.98%-13.49%23.14%16.57%24.54%-9.22%17.36%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.12%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and RSP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014

0.96

The correlation between EQAL and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQAL vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQAL
RSP

Technology

14.8%
19.6%

Industrials

9.5%
14.1%

Financial Services

9.4%
14.5%

Healthcare

9.4%
11.0%

Energy

9.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

9.1%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
6.5%

Basic Materials

8.0%
4.1%

Utilities

7.9%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
9.9%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.7%

Technology

EQAL
14.8%
RSP
19.6%

Industrials

EQAL
9.5%
RSP
14.1%

Financial Services

EQAL
9.4%
RSP
14.5%

Healthcare

EQAL
9.4%
RSP
11.0%

Energy

EQAL
9.1%
RSP
4.5%

Real Estate

EQAL
9.1%
RSP
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

EQAL
8.1%
RSP
6.5%

Basic Materials

EQAL
8.0%
RSP
4.1%

Utilities

EQAL
7.9%
RSP
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EQAL
7.7%
RSP
9.9%

Communication Services

EQAL
7.2%
RSP
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQAL vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL
EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQALRSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

1.82

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.63

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.68

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.09

10.20

+3.89

EQAL vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQALRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.82

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.65

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.57

-0.05

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQALRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.44%

-59.92%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-7.85%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-17.81%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.79%

-21.38%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-39.04%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-6.65%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.06%

-0.17%

Volatility

EQAL vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.61%. This indicates that EQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQALRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.61%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.31%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

11.56%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

16.18%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

18.36%

+0.52%

EQAL vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EQAL and RSP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQAL vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than RSP's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
1.63%1.79%1.62%1.88%1.95%1.32%1.63%1.61%1.62%1.18%1.57%1.64%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.48%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, EQAL and RSP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EQAL has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to RSP (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.90% vs 10.74% for EQAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQAL and RSP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.48% for RSP.

EQAL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQAL and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer