EQ vs. ZIM
EQ (Equillium Inc) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. EQ operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while ZIM operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, EQ returned -14.81%/yr vs 20.68%/yr for ZIM. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQ vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQ achieves a 100.65% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 19.30% return.
EQ
- 1D
- 11.47%
- 1M
- 48.10%
- YTD
- 100.65%
- 6M
- 256.86%
- 1Y
- 771.15%
- 3Y*
- 70.29%
- 5Y*
- -14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
ZIM
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 43.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.68%
- 10Y*
- —
EQ vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQ Equillium Inc | 100.65% | 107.16% | 3.49% | -31.79% | -71.88% | -38.30% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 19.30% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQ and ZIM is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.03 |
The correlation between EQ and ZIM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EQ:
$299.43M
ZIM:
$2.95B
EQ:
-$0.29
ZIM:
$0.81
EQ:
5.03
ZIM:
0.77
EQ:
$0.00
ZIM:
$6.29B
EQ:
-$83.00K
ZIM:
$676.00M
EQ:
-$19.95M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQ vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
EQ
ZIM
EQ vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equillium Inc (EQ) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQ | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.23 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.47 | 1.77 | +11.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.64 | 4.29 | +25.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQ | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69 | 1.03 | +3.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.32 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.75 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
EQ vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQ drawdown since its inception was -98.91%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQ and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQ | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.91% | -84.68% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.79% | -30.66% | -27.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.33% | -57.12% | -33.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.20% | -84.68% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.26% | -14.19% | -74.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.98% | -40.05% | -44.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.22% | 12.65% | +13.57% |
Volatility
EQ vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
Equillium Inc (EQ) has a higher volatility of 39.76% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 14.70%. This indicates that EQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQ | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.76% | 14.70% | +25.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.48% | 37.41% | +42.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 166.03% | 53.01% | +113.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.85% | 65.89% | +48.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 288.90% | 67.72% | +221.18% |
Dividends
EQ vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
EQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQ Equillium Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 5.10% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% |
Financials
EQ vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equillium Inc and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EQ and ZIM have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQ has higher volatility (39.76%) compared to ZIM (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQ dropped -98.91% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
EQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQ and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer