EQ vs. FNUC
EQ (Equillium Inc) and FNUC (Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc.) are both stocks. EQ operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while FNUC operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, EQ returned 58.74%/yr vs -61.43%/yr for FNUC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQ vs. FNUC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQ achieves a 83.23% return, which is significantly higher than FNUC's -39.33% return.
EQ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 25.66%
- YTD
- 83.23%
- 6M
- 110.37%
- 1Y
- 879.31%
- 3Y*
- 58.74%
- 5Y*
- -13.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FNUC
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- YTD
- -39.33%
- 6M
- -47.25%
- 1Y
- -44.85%
- 3Y*
- -61.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQ vs. FNUC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQ Equillium Inc | 83.23% | 107.16% | 3.49% | -31.79% | -71.88% | -27.50% |
FNUC Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. | -39.33% | -75.96% | -17.95% | -48.68% | -60.42% | -49.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQ and FNUC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQ vs. FNUC — Risk / Return Rank
EQ
FNUC
EQ vs. FNUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equillium Inc (EQ) and Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (FNUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQ | FNUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 0.97 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.37 | -0.71 | +16.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.03 | -1.21 | +35.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQ vs. FNUC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQ drawdown since its inception was -98.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FNUC drawdown of -98.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQ and FNUC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQ | FNUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.91% | -98.93% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.79% | -71.45% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.33% | -94.50% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.28% | -98.92% | +9.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.97% | -86.68% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.05% | 42.84% | -16.79% |
Volatility
EQ vs. FNUC - Volatility Comparison
Equillium Inc (EQ) and Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (FNUC) have volatilities of 27.18% and 26.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQ | FNUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.18% | 26.39% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.18% | 70.56% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 165.77% | 100.90% | +64.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.86% | 212.66% | -97.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 287.91% | 212.66% | +75.25% |
Dividends
EQ vs. FNUC - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQ nor FNUC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EQ vs. FNUC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equillium Inc and Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EQ and FNUC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQ has higher volatility (27.18%) compared to FNUC (26.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQ dropped -98.91% vs FNUC's -98.93%.
EQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.37 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQ and FNUC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer