EPR vs. ATMP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EPR (EPR Properties) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 10 years, EPR returned 3.90%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EPR vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPR Properties (EPR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPR achieves a 23.29% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's 20.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EPR has underperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 3.90%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.20% annualized return.

EPR

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 23.29%
• 6M: 23.59%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 17.65%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 3.90%

ATMP

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -3.30%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 20.43%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 21.55%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPR vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPR EPR Properties	23.29%	20.52%	-1.25%	38.83%	-14.61%	50.60%	-52.09%	17.13%	3.59%	-3.41%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	20.60%	1.73%	31.66%	14.51%	20.71%	33.06%	-34.39%	0.39%	-14.55%	-11.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EPR and ATMP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013	0.33

The correlation between EPR and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EPR vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPR

EPR Risk / Return Rank: 55
EPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EPR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EPR Martin Ratio Rank: 56

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 44
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPR vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPR Properties (EPR) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPR	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.31	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	1.87	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.23	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	2.53	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.15	5.89	-4.74

EPR vs. ATMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the ATMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPR and ATMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPR vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPR drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPR and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPR	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.02%	-80.86%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.51%	-7.30%	-12.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-16.48%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.63%	-22.98%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.02%	-75.66%	-6.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.61%	+5.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.58%	-31.08%	+14.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.81%	3.13%	+6.68%

Volatility

EPR vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EPR Properties (EPR) is 5.14%, while Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that EPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPR	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	5.64%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.49%	10.99%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.44%	14.18%	+8.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.16%	22.25%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.44%	27.67%	+14.77%

Dividends

EPR vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

EPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EPR EPR Properties	5.99%	7.05%	7.68%	6.81%	8.62%	3.16%	4.66%	6.37%	5.62%	6.23%	5.35%	6.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPR and ATMP in my portfolio?

EPR and ATMP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPR or ATMP?

ATMP has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to EPR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPR dropped -82.02% vs ATMP's -80.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.