PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPR vs. ESS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EPR vs. ESS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPR Properties (EPR) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPR achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than ESS's 8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EPR has underperformed ESS with an annualized return of 3.56%, while ESS has yielded a comparatively higher 6.13% annualized return.


EPR

1D
0.46%
1M
2.68%
YTD
16.31%
6M
11.49%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
3.56%

ESS

1D
0.23%
1M
5.40%
YTD
8.28%
6M
8.67%
1Y
1.42%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPR vs. ESS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPR
EPR Properties
16.31%20.52%-1.25%38.83%-14.61%50.60%-52.09%17.13%3.59%-3.41%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
8.28%-4.98%18.36%21.97%-37.76%52.40%-18.09%25.92%4.83%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EPR and ESS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 1997

0.53

The correlation between EPR and ESS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

EPR:

$3.55

ESS:

$9.59

PE Ratio

EPR:

15.91

ESS:

28.94

PEG Ratio

EPR:

0.34

ESS:

2.03

PS Ratio

EPR:

6.17

ESS:

7.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPR:

$700.22M

ESS:

$1.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPR:

$568.77M

ESS:

$1.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

EPR:

$582.57M

ESS:

$1.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPR vs. ESS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPR
EPR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ESS
ESS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ESS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ESS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPR vs. ESS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPR Properties (EPR) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRESSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

0.07

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

0.23

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.03

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.10

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.85

0.17

+0.68

EPR vs. ESS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the ESS Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPR and ESS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRESSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

0.07

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.06

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.24

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.50

-0.20

Drawdowns

EPR vs. ESS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPR drawdown since its inception was -82.02%, which is greater than ESS's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPR and ESS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRESSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.02%

-62.67%

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.51%

-16.49%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-20.77%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-43.87%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.02%

-44.84%

-37.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-9.93%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-10.86%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.79%

9.80%

-0.01%

Volatility

EPR vs. ESS - Volatility Comparison

EPR Properties (EPR) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) at 4.48%. This indicates that EPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRESSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.48%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

14.07%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

20.76%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.22%

23.70%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.45%

25.81%

+16.64%

Dividends

EPR vs. ESS - Dividend Comparison

EPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than ESS's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPR
EPR Properties
6.35%7.05%7.68%6.81%8.62%3.16%4.66%6.37%5.62%6.23%5.35%6.21%
ESS
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
3.71%3.88%2.57%3.73%4.15%2.37%3.50%2.59%3.03%2.90%2.75%2.41%

Financials

EPR vs. ESS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPR Properties and Essex Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
181.25M
484.76M
(EPR) Total Revenue
(ESS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EPR vs. ESS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EPR Properties and Essex Property Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.8%
70.9%
Portfolio components
EPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a gross profit of 180.96M and revenue of 181.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.8%.

ESS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.50M and revenue of 484.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

EPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported an operating income of 100.62M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.5%.

ESS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 155.19M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.0%.

EPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a net income of 62.61M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.

ESS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essex Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -6.02M and revenue of 484.76M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EPR and ESS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to ESS (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPR dropped -82.02% vs ESS's -62.67%.

EPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPR and ESS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer