EPIN vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EPIN is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past year, EPIN returned 37.79% vs 25.30% for EFAS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPIN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

EPIN vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 12.03% return.

EPIN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 6M: 21.92%
• 1Y: 37.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 6M: 11.93%
• 1Y: 25.30%
• 3Y*: 24.65%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	21.76%	14.36%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	12.03%	13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and EFAS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.50

The correlation between EPIN and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPIN vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPIN	EFAS
Technology	34.1%	0.1%
Industrials	20.4%	10.4%
Financial Services	17.7%	31.0%
Basic Materials	7.3%	1.7%
Healthcare	6.6%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	1.9%
Energy	4.2%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	8.1%
Communication Services	1.2%	8.6%
Real Estate	-	11.4%
Utilities	-	13.7%

Return for Risk

EPIN vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN

EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 73
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 81
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPIN	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.32	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	3.29	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	4.79	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	12.23	-0.01

EPIN vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIN and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPIN	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.64%	-44.38%	+32.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-5.30%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-3.81%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-7.05%	+5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.07%	+1.03%

Volatility

EPIN vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.47%. This indicates that EPIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPIN	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	3.47%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	8.69%	+7.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.66%	10.95%	+7.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.42%	15.58%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	18.30%	+0.12%

EPIN vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPIN vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than EFAS's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.76%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	0.65%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPIN and EFAS in my portfolio?

EPIN and EFAS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPIN or EFAS?

EPIN has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to EFAS (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, EPIN or EFAS?

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 37.79% vs 25.30% for EFAS. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPIN or EFAS?

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 37.79% return vs 25.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPIN or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPIN or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.65% for EPIN.

What is the main difference between EPIN and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.