EPIN vs. HAPS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) and HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPIN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross. EPIN is actively managed, while HAPS is passively managed. Over the past year, EPIN returned 38.00% vs 32.55% for HAPS. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPIN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HAPS.

Performance

EPIN vs. HAPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 23.34% return, which is significantly higher than HAPS's 18.77% return.

EPIN

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -0.70%
• 6M: 14.34%
• YTD: 23.34%
• 1Y: 38.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.77%

HAPS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 15.97%
• YTD: 18.77%
• 1Y: 32.55%
• 3Y*: 11.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	$41.81K	$24.58K	$20.32K
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	$1.41K	$1.61K	$1.56K

EPIN vs. HAPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	23.34%	14.36%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	18.77%	14.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and HAPS is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.64

The correlation between EPIN and HAPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPIN vs. HAPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPIN	HAPS
Technology	29.6%	15.8%
Industrials	20.6%	14.4%
Financial Services	19.1%	17.6%
Healthcare	8.2%	17.8%
Basic Materials	7.1%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	8.9%
Energy	3.8%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	2.6%
Communication Services	1.0%	2.8%
Real Estate	-	5.9%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

EPIN vs. HAPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPIN

EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 84

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 81
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPIN vs. HAPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPIN	HAPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.85	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.74	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.08	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	10.60	+0.92

EPIN vs. HAPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the HAPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIN and HAPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. HAPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum HAPS drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and HAPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPIN	HAPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.64%	-27.44%	+15.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-10.01%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-1.66%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-5.87%	+3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	2.90%	+0.33%

Volatility

EPIN vs. HAPS - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) at 3.12%. This indicates that EPIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPIN	HAPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	3.12%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.99%	11.54%	+5.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	16.72%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.37%	20.52%	-2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	20.52%	-2.15%

EPIN vs. HAPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HAPS's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPIN vs. HAPS - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than HAPS's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	0.64%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.48%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPIN and HAPS in my portfolio?

EPIN and HAPS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPIN or HAPS?

EPIN has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to HAPS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs HAPS's -27.44%.

Which ETF is better, EPIN or HAPS?

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 38.00% vs 32.55% for HAPS. On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPIN or HAPS?

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 38.00% return vs 32.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPIN or HAPS?

HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPIN or HAPS?

EPIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.48% for HAPS.

What is the main difference between EPIN and HAPS?

EPIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HAPS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.60% for HAPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.