PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPIN vs. HAPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPIN vs. HAPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 22.02% return, which is significantly higher than HAPS's 14.76% return.


EPIN

1D
-2.50%
1M
3.40%
YTD
22.02%
6M
22.38%
1Y
39.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HAPS

1D
0.13%
1M
4.37%
YTD
14.76%
6M
12.78%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. HAPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and HAPS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.68

The correlation between EPIN and HAPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPIN vs. HAPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPIN
HAPS

Technology

34.1%
16.8%

Industrials

20.4%
14.7%

Financial Services

17.7%
17.3%

Basic Materials

7.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

6.6%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
8.4%

Energy

4.2%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
2.7%

Communication Services

1.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

-

5.9%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Technology

EPIN
34.1%
HAPS
16.8%

Industrials

EPIN
20.4%
HAPS
14.7%

Financial Services

EPIN
17.7%
HAPS
17.3%

Basic Materials

EPIN
7.3%
HAPS
5.7%

Healthcare

EPIN
6.6%
HAPS
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EPIN
6.1%
HAPS
8.4%

Energy

EPIN
4.2%
HAPS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

EPIN
2.5%
HAPS
2.7%

Communication Services

EPIN
1.2%
HAPS
2.7%

Real Estate

EPIN

-

HAPS
5.9%

Utilities

EPIN

-

HAPS
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPIN vs. HAPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN
EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

HAPS
HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. HAPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPINHAPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.08

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

10.43

+2.48

EPIN vs. HAPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the HAPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIN and HAPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. HAPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum HAPS drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and HAPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPINHAPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-27.44%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-10.01%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

0.00%

-2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-6.04%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.95%

+0.14%

Volatility

EPIN vs. HAPS - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) at 4.01%. This indicates that EPIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPINHAPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

4.01%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

11.92%

+4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

17.10%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

20.75%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

20.75%

-2.30%

EPIN vs. HAPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HAPS's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPIN vs. HAPS - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than HAPS's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EPIN
Harbor International Equity ETF
0.65%0.79%0.00%0.00%
HAPS
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF
0.49%0.57%0.72%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPIN and HAPS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPIN has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to HAPS (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs HAPS's -27.44%.

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 39.81% vs 30.70% for HAPS. On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 39.81% return vs 30.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

EPIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.49% for HAPS.

EPIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HAPS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.60% for HAPS.

EPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPIN and HAPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer