EPIN vs. SCHF
EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EPIN is actively managed, while SCHF is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPIN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
EPIN vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 25.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 16.56% return.
EPIN
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 12.44%
- YTD
- 25.75%
- 6M
- 30.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 32.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
EPIN vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 25.75% | 14.68% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 16.56% | 14.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPIN and SCHF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.92 |
EPIN vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPIN
SCHF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EPIN
SCHF
Industrials
EPIN
SCHF
Financial Services
EPIN
SCHF
Basic Materials
EPIN
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
EPIN
SCHF
Healthcare
EPIN
SCHF
Energy
EPIN
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
EPIN
SCHF
Communication Services
EPIN
SCHF
Real Estate
EPIN
-
SCHF
Utilities
EPIN
-
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPIN vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
EPIN
SCHF
EPIN vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPIN | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.60 | 0.44 | +2.16 |
Drawdowns
EPIN vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPIN | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -34.87% | +23.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -7.38% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
EPIN vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPIN | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 15.75% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 16.38% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 17.19% | +0.18% |
EPIN vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPIN vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SCHF's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF | 0.63% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.93% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EPIN and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.63% for EPIN.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.06% for SCHF.
Find the right allocation for EPIN and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer