ENZL vs. ASEA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENZL (iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF) and ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ENZL tracks the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index while ASEA tracks the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENZL returned 3.34%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for ASEA. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENZL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASEA.

Performance

ENZL vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 9.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ENZL has underperformed ASEA with an annualized return of 3.34%, while ASEA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.64% annualized return.

ENZL

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: -0.60%
• 6M: -1.29%
• 1Y: 3.15%
• 3Y*: -0.29%
• 5Y*: -4.24%
• 10Y*: 3.34%

ASEA

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 9.50%
• 6M: 12.22%
• 1Y: 26.01%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 7.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENZL vs. ASEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	-0.60%	2.47%	-4.86%	2.95%	-16.18%	-11.39%	20.04%	30.09%	0.35%	24.04%
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	9.50%	19.80%	9.82%	4.88%	5.24%	4.66%	-7.88%	8.34%	-7.58%	35.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ENZL and ASEA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2011	0.47

ENZL vs. ASEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ENZL	ASEA
Utilities	29.0%	4.4%
Healthcare	26.1%	2.3%
Industrials	19.0%	15.4%
Real Estate	12.6%	2.8%
Basic Materials	3.8%	2.1%
Communication Services	3.7%	8.8%
Energy	2.0%	3.5%
Financial Services	1.4%	58.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	2.2%
Technology	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

ENZL vs. ASEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENZL

ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 11
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 12

ASEA

ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 56
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENZL vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENZL	ASEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	1.87	-1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	2.74	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.34	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	3.16	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	8.72	-8.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENZL vs. ASEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the ASEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENZL and ASEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENZL	ASEA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	1.87	-1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	0.67	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.44	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.27	+0.09

Drawdowns

ENZL vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ASEA drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and ASEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENZL	ASEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.44%	-44.16%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-8.28%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.67%	-22.20%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.86%	-22.20%	-14.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.44%	-44.16%	+1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.65%	-2.81%	-26.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.78%	-10.66%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	2.99%	+1.55%

Volatility

ENZL vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) at 3.40%. This indicates that ENZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENZL	ASEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	3.40%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	11.20%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.97%	14.01%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	14.66%	+3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	17.59%	+2.85%

ENZL vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENZL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENZL vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison

ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than ASEA's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	3.61%	3.95%	3.61%	3.76%	2.23%	4.19%	2.27%	2.51%	3.08%	1.59%	2.78%	3.64%
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	2.25%	2.23%	2.13%	3.00%	1.62%	2.46%	1.66%	3.35%	3.60%	3.69%	4.79%	4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENZL and ASEA in my portfolio?

ENZL and ASEA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ENZL or ASEA?

ENZL has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to ASEA (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENZL dropped -42.44% vs ASEA's -44.16%.

Which ETF is better, ENZL or ASEA?

On 10-year performance, ASEA leads with 7.64% vs 3.34% for ENZL. On fees, ENZL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ENZL or ASEA?

Over the 10-year period, ASEA has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 3.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENZL or ASEA?

ENZL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENZL or ASEA?

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.25% for ENZL.

What is the main difference between ENZL and ASEA?

ENZL tracks MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index, while ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ENZL and 0.65% for ASEA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.