PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENZL vs. EWQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENZL vs. EWQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than EWQ's 1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, ENZL has underperformed EWQ with an annualized return of 3.51%, while EWQ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.13% annualized return.


ENZL

1D
-1.42%
1M
2.96%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.12%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
0.26%
5Y*
-3.58%
10Y*
3.51%

EWQ

1D
-1.19%
1M
2.85%
YTD
1.20%
6M
2.17%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENZL vs. EWQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF
1.06%2.47%-4.86%2.95%-16.18%-11.39%20.04%30.09%0.35%24.04%
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
1.20%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%29.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ENZL and EWQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2010

0.55

The correlation between ENZL and EWQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

ENZL vs. EWQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENZL
EWQ

Utilities

29.0%
2.6%

Healthcare

26.1%
8.4%

Industrials

19.0%
31.7%

Real Estate

12.6%
1.4%

Basic Materials

3.8%
7.0%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.0%

Energy

2.0%
8.0%

Financial Services

1.4%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
8.3%

Technology

0.6%
4.1%

Utilities

ENZL
29.0%
EWQ
2.6%

Healthcare

ENZL
26.1%
EWQ
8.4%

Industrials

ENZL
19.0%
EWQ
31.7%

Real Estate

ENZL
12.6%
EWQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

ENZL
3.8%
EWQ
7.0%

Communication Services

ENZL
3.7%
EWQ
3.0%

Energy

ENZL
2.0%
EWQ
8.0%

Financial Services

ENZL
1.4%
EWQ
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ENZL
0.9%
EWQ
12.0%

Consumer Defensive

ENZL
0.8%
EWQ
8.3%

Technology

ENZL
0.6%
EWQ
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENZL vs. EWQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENZL
ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENZL vs. EWQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENZLEWQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.54

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.46

0.88

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.67

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.19

2.08

-0.89

ENZL vs. EWQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the EWQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENZL and EWQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENZLEWQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.54

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.32

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.44

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.27

+0.10

Drawdowns

ENZL vs. EWQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum EWQ drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and EWQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENZLEWQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-61.41%

+18.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-13.80%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-15.16%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.86%

-31.46%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.44%

-39.23%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.48%

-5.83%

-22.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-16.08%

+3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

4.46%

+0.06%

Volatility

ENZL vs. EWQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is 5.74%, while iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that ENZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENZLEWQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

6.56%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

13.52%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.95%

17.15%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

19.78%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

20.81%

-0.37%

ENZL vs. EWQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENZL and EWQ have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

ENZL vs. EWQ - Dividend Comparison

ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than EWQ's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF
2.21%2.23%2.13%3.00%1.62%2.46%1.66%3.35%3.60%3.69%4.79%4.29%
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.60%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENZL and EWQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWQ has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to ENZL (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENZL dropped -42.44% vs EWQ's -61.41%.

On 10-year performance, EWQ leads with 9.13% vs 3.51% for ENZL. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, ENZL has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWQ has performed better with a 9.13% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENZL and EWQ have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.21% for ENZL.

ENZL is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EWQ is Europe Equities. ENZL tracks MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index, while EWQ tracks MSCI France Index.

EWQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENZL and EWQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer