ENZL vs. MNRO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO).

ENZL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2010.

Performance

ENZL vs. MNRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENZL vs. MNRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	-5.80%	2.47%	-4.86%	2.95%	-16.18%	-11.39%	20.04%	30.09%	0.35%	24.04%
MNRO Monro, Inc.	-18.96%	-13.81%	-11.99%	-33.10%	-20.59%	11.13%	-30.65%	15.00%	22.21%	0.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly higher than MNRO's -18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ENZL has outperformed MNRO with an annualized return of 3.33%, while MNRO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.71% annualized return.

ENZL

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -10.18%
• YTD: -5.80%
• 6M: -5.97%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: -2.77%
• 5Y*: -5.18%
• 10Y*: 3.33%

MNRO

• 1D: 3.55%
• 1M: -25.50%
• YTD: -18.96%
• 6M: -8.26%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: -27.95%
• 5Y*: -21.54%
• 10Y*: -11.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ENZL vs. MNRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENZL

ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 18
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MNRO

MNRO Risk / Return Rank: 50
MNRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
MNRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MNRO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MNRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MNRO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENZL vs. MNRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENZL	MNRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	0.27	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	0.90	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.12	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	0.20	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.07	0.58	+0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENZL vs. MNRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is comparable to the MNRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENZL and MNRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENZL	MNRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	0.27	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	-0.48	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	-0.28	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.11	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between ENZL and MNRO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ENZL vs. MNRO - Dividend Comparison

ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than MNRO's 6.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	2.37%	2.23%	2.13%	3.00%	1.62%	2.46%	1.66%	3.35%	3.60%	3.69%	4.79%	4.29%
MNRO Monro, Inc.	6.98%	5.59%	4.52%	3.82%	2.43%	1.68%	1.65%	1.10%	1.13%	1.25%	1.15%	0.88%

Drawdowns

ENZL vs. MNRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum MNRO drawdown of -84.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and MNRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENZL	MNRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.44%	-84.13%	+41.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-36.17%	+23.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.18%	-80.66%	+43.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.44%	-84.13%	+41.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.33%	-77.84%	+44.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.58%	-25.94%	+13.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	12.32%	-8.86%

Volatility

ENZL vs. MNRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is 7.12%, while Monro, Inc. (MNRO) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that ENZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENZL	MNRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.12%	16.19%	-9.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	38.40%	-26.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	66.25%	-48.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	44.64%	-26.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.39%	41.74%	-21.35%