ENZL vs. EWA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA).
ENZL and EWA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENZL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2010. EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996. Both ENZL and EWA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ENZL or EWA.
Performance
ENZL vs. EWA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than EWA's 9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ENZL has underperformed EWA with an annualized return of 4.93%, while EWA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.49% annualized return.
ENZL
-1.26%
-2.32%
6.08%
10.44%
-0.10%
4.93%
EWA
9.89%
0.38%
9.17%
22.65%
7.35%
5.49%
Key characteristics
| ENZL | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.53 | 1.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.90 | 1.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.27 | 1.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.87 | 7.02 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.98% | 3.16% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.50% | 16.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.44% | -66.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.32% | -3.21% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENZL vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ENZL and EWA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Correlation
The correlation between ENZL and EWA is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ENZL vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ENZL vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison
ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than EWA's 3.65% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | 2.80% | 3.00% | 1.62% | 2.46% | 1.66% | 3.35% | 3.60% | 3.69% | 4.78% | 4.29% | 5.15% | 3.95% |
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 3.65% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 4.69% |
Drawdowns
ENZL vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum EWA drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and EWA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ENZL vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is 3.71%, while iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ENZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.