EMNT vs. FLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).
EMNT and FLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMNT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 10, 2019. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMNT or FLTR.
Correlation
The correlation between EMNT and FLTR is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMNT vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMNT:
4.76
FLTR:
7.45
EMNT:
7.38
FLTR:
12.16
EMNT:
4.03
FLTR:
3.92
EMNT:
7.90
FLTR:
10.09
EMNT:
116.71
FLTR:
113.39
EMNT:
0.05%
FLTR:
0.07%
EMNT:
1.21%
FLTR:
1.00%
EMNT:
-2.28%
FLTR:
-17.84%
EMNT:
-0.11%
FLTR:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMNT achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 7.12% return.
EMNT
5.50%
0.24%
2.60%
5.73%
2.63%
N/A
FLTR
7.12%
0.56%
3.12%
7.43%
3.45%
2.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMNT vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNT has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMNT vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMNT vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than FLTR's 5.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund | 5.16% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 5.99% | 6.08% | 2.30% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
EMNT vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and FLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMNT vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) have volatilities of 0.20% and 0.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.