PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNT vs. VRIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMNT vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMNT vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
0.97%4.74%5.79%5.84%-0.57%0.11%2.08%0.09%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
0.90%5.05%6.81%7.37%0.99%1.06%1.76%0.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMNT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 0.90% return.


EMNT

1D
0.05%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.97%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*

VRIG

1D
0.06%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.12%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMNT vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMNT vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNT
EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VRIG
VRIG Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VRIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRIG Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VRIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRIG Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNT vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMNTVRIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

11.02

5.20

+5.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

23.01

6.80

+16.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

5.88

3.21

+2.68

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

34.06

6.26

+27.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

226.92

52.80

+174.12

EMNT vs. VRIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNT Sharpe Ratio is 11.02, which is higher than the VRIG Sharpe Ratio of 5.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNT and VRIG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMNTVRIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02

5.20

+5.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.08

3.34

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.45

0.89

+2.56

Correlation

The correlation between EMNT and VRIG is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMNT vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison

EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than VRIG's 4.89% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
4.23%4.46%5.14%4.62%2.79%0.66%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
4.89%4.99%6.09%5.97%2.39%0.78%1.57%3.12%2.89%2.31%0.60%

Drawdowns

EMNT vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum VRIG drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and VRIG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNTVRIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-13.04%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-0.78%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.70%

-2.28%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-0.27%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.09%

-0.07%

Volatility

EMNT vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) has a higher volatility of 0.24% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.18%. This indicates that EMNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMNTVRIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.18%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.29%

0.37%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

0.93%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

1.29%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.87%

3.83%

-2.96%