EMNT vs. LQDH
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH).
EMNT and LQDH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMNT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 10, 2019. LQDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 27, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMNT or LQDH.
Correlation
The correlation between EMNT and LQDH is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMNT vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMNT:
4.72
LQDH:
2.68
EMNT:
7.36
LQDH:
3.92
EMNT:
3.97
LQDH:
1.54
EMNT:
7.88
LQDH:
3.92
EMNT:
115.44
LQDH:
19.80
EMNT:
0.05%
LQDH:
0.36%
EMNT:
1.22%
LQDH:
2.66%
EMNT:
-2.28%
LQDH:
-24.63%
EMNT:
0.00%
LQDH:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMNT achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 0.39% return.
EMNT
0.25%
0.42%
2.72%
5.75%
2.68%
N/A
LQDH
0.39%
0.21%
3.85%
7.39%
4.06%
3.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMNT vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNT has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMNT vs. LQDH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMNT
LQDH
EMNT vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMNT vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than LQDH's 7.54% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund | 5.13% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 7.54% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.64% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% | 2.19% |
Drawdowns
EMNT vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and LQDH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMNT vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund (EMNT) is 0.23%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that EMNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.