EMLC vs. RSPS
EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) and RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMLC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index, while RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMLC returned 2.28%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for RSPS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMLC charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPS.
Performance
EMLC vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than RSPS's 7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLC has underperformed RSPS with an annualized return of 2.28%, while RSPS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.67% annualized return.
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
EMLC vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.30% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLC and RSPS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLC vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank
EMLC
RSPS
EMLC vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMLC | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 0.42 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 0.77 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMLC vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, smaller than the maximum RSPS drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and RSPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLC | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -35.93% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -11.72% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.15% | -16.53% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -18.61% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.47% | -25.42% | -1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -6.32% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -5.05% | -9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 6.29% | -4.43% |
Volatility
EMLC vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) is 2.44%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that EMLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLC | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 4.33% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 10.48% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06% | 13.78% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 13.65% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.04% | 14.89% | -4.85% |
EMLC vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLC vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison
EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than RSPS's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLC and RSPS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPS has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to EMLC (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLC dropped -32.43% vs RSPS's -35.93%.
On 10-year performance, RSPS leads with 4.67% vs 2.28% for EMLC. On fees, EMLC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EMLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPS has performed better with a 4.67% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMLC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 2.71% for RSPS.
EMLC is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while RSPS is Consumer Staples Equities. EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index, while RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMLC and 0.40% for RSPS.
EMLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMLC and RSPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer