EMDV vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while EEMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMDV returned 2.45%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for EEMO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

EMDV vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 35.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EMDV has underperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 2.45%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.

EMDV

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: -1.87%
• 6M: -2.68%
• 1Y: 4.25%
• 3Y*: 2.28%
• 5Y*: -3.40%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

EEMO

• 1D: -8.31%
• 1M: 6.72%
• YTD: 35.52%
• 6M: 35.05%
• 1Y: 47.55%
• 3Y*: 23.13%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: 8.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDV vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	-1.87%	11.90%	0.06%	-1.03%	-18.19%	1.11%	-0.09%	14.93%	-7.52%	26.98%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	35.52%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV and EEMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2016	0.65

The correlation between EMDV and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDV vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMDV	EEMO
Technology	24.7%	53.0%
Financial Services	23.4%	15.4%
Consumer Defensive	15.8%	0.6%
Utilities	8.2%	1.0%
Healthcare	7.7%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	2.8%
Industrials	5.9%	7.5%
Communication Services	5.7%	1.2%
Basic Materials	2.1%	9.9%
Energy	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

EMDV vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 15
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 58
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDV vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMDV	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.58	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.17	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	3.24	-2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	11.80	-10.13

EMDV vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMDV vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDV	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.20%	-48.47%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-14.75%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.71%	-26.06%	+5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.13%	-34.03%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	-46.57%	+7.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.36%	-8.31%	-9.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	-20.11%	+6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	4.04%	-1.50%

Volatility

EMDV vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is 4.26%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that EMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDV	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	20.47%	-16.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.72%	28.78%	-19.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	30.30%	-18.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	20.93%	-5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	22.33%	-4.16%

EMDV vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMDV vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than EEMO's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.67%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.48%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMDV and EEMO in my portfolio?

EMDV and EEMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMDV or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to EMDV (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDV dropped -39.20% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, EMDV or EEMO?

On 10-year performance, EEMO leads with 8.71% vs 2.45% for EMDV. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMDV or EEMO?

Over the 10-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMDV or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMDV or EEMO?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.67% for EEMO.

What is the main difference between EMDV and EEMO?

EMDV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMDV and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.