EMDV vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
EMDV and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both EMDV and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMDV or NOBL.
Correlation
The correlation between EMDV and NOBL is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMDV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMDV:
0.19
NOBL:
0.95
EMDV:
0.39
NOBL:
1.37
EMDV:
1.05
NOBL:
1.17
EMDV:
0.11
NOBL:
1.25
EMDV:
0.50
NOBL:
3.89
EMDV:
6.45%
NOBL:
2.50%
EMDV:
16.91%
NOBL:
10.26%
EMDV:
-39.20%
NOBL:
-35.43%
EMDV:
-23.84%
NOBL:
-7.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 7.38% return.
EMDV
1.26%
-1.73%
2.69%
3.53%
-3.63%
N/A
NOBL
7.38%
-4.11%
4.12%
8.64%
8.12%
9.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMDV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMDV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMDV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than NOBL's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.17% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.45% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
EMDV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMDV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.48%. This indicates that EMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.